US Trade Moving Mexico in Front of China for the New Re-Globalization

Dr. Said El Mansour Cherkaoui has conducted research on Brazil, Mexico, Latin America since 1979 at the Institut de Recherches Economiques et de Planification, Université de Grenoble, France. In 1981, Said El Mansour Cherkaoui spent one year conducting research at the University of California Berkeley, at the Center for Latin American Studies – CLAS at Berkeley and Simon Bolivar House at the Stanford University. The following year, Said El Mansour Cherkaoui joined the Institute des Hautes Etudes sur l’Amérique Latine, Université de la Sorbonne and the Centre de Recherche et de Documentation sur l’Amérique Latine, CREDAL in Paris where he published one of his research on the Economic Intervention of the Brazilian State.

Author: Said El Mansour Cherkaoui holds a Doctorate on Economics from the Université de la Sorbonne and the Institut des Hautes Etudes de l’Amérique Latine, Paris. Dr. Cherkaoui conducted Research and is a Published Author at the Centre de Recherche et de Documentation sur l’Amérique Latine, Laboratoire 111 Associated with the Centre National de la … Continue reading Said El Mansour Cherkaoui on Latin America – MOROCCO DIGITALL AFRICA

Said El Mansour Cherkaoui Research – Publication: From NAFTA to CUSMA

Said El Mansour Cherkaoui From NAFTA to CUSMA December 8, 1987 – December 8, 2021:From #NAFTA to #CUSMA Lic Cuautémoc Cárdenas – Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas Solórzano David Fike – President of Golden Gate University Publications of Said El Mansour Cherkaoui on Mexico and the Integration of North American MarketThe North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was signed into law by the U.S….Read More

Said El Mansour Cherkaoui and Brazil

Said El Mansour Cherkaoui – ECONOMIE POLITIQUE DU SUBCAPITALISME EN AMERIQUE LATINE (1830-1930) : ARGENTINE – BRESIL – CHILI – PEROU. سعيد المنصور شرقاوي saidcherkaoui24@gmail.com Version Française: Dr. Said El Mansour Cherkaoui est diplômé de l’Institut des Hautes Etudes de l’Amérique Latine et de l’Université de Sorbonne, de l’Institut de Recherche Économique et de Planification et de l’Institut de Sciences…Read More


Re-Globalization of the U.S. Trade and Reviving Mexico Supply Chain

Mexico became the top U.S. trading partner at the beginning of 2023, with total bilateral trade between the two countries totaling $263 billion during the first four months of this year.

Mexico’s emergence followed fractious U.S. relations with China, which had moved past Canada to claim the top trading spot in 2014. The dynamic changed in 2018 when the U.S. imposed tariffs on China’s goods and with subsequent pandemic-era supply-chain disruptions that altered international trade and investment flows worldwide.

Mexico’s gains mirror its rise in manufacturing, a key component of goods moving between it and the U.S. During the first four months of 2023, total trade of manufactured goods between Mexico and the U.S. reached $234.2 billion.

Overall, Mexican imports to the U.S. totaled $157 billion; U.S. exports to Mexico reached $107 billion.

Mexico–U.S. trade during the first four months of 2023 represented 15.4 percent of all the goods exported and imported by the U.S.; the Canada–U.S. share followed at 15.2 percent and then the China–U.S. share at 12.0 percent (Chart 1).


After nearly a decade, China is no longer the United States’ top trading partner. That position now goes to Mexico, with Canada right behind it. China’s getting bumped from the top two spots can be traced to the Trump administration’s 2018 import tariffs, which remain in place today; pandemic supply chain problems also played a role. In addition to reflecting an increasingly troubled Sino-American relationship, the Mexico-China swap points to “a real shift in the dynamics of the global economy — away from prioritizing low prices and greater efficiency,” writes Axios.

  • Reduced trade with China could mean higher costs for U.S. consumers.

Mexico positioned as a manufacturing base

Mexico’s expanding manufacturing base has offered an alternative to producing in China. Sourcing or producing goods in a nearby country is sometimes referred to as “nearshoring.” While data on recent nearshoring is thin and evidence of it is largely anecdotal, increased protectionism and related industrial policy are consistent with less global trade, more regional trade, and nearshoring and reshoring (returning production to the home country).

More activity in Mexico would support increased bilateral manufacturing with the U.S. It would also bolster Mexico’s standing as the U.S.’ leading manufacturing trading partner, a ranking it achieved in 2022 (Chart 2).

The U.S. and Mexico are more than neighbors

The Boomerang Effect by the Dragon of the Day: China in Mexico, Central and Latin America

Why Chinese Companies Are Investing Billions in Mexico?

In 2021, Chinese companies were responsible for 30 percent of foreign investment in Nuevo León, second only to the United States at 47 percent.


China is just catching up with the rest of the developed world and has all the right to expand its relations with Latin America like the rest of the globe, no more Monroe Doctrine or the Mercantilism Time for Latin America.

Latin American countries are opting for diverse international trade, economic and financial relationships and seeking also to learn about different cultures than the ones they inherited from the Europeans.

Since the independence movement and since the mid of the early 19th century, Latin American leaders have been seeking the inclusion of Asians in their economies as a way to reinforce their modernization drive and consolidate their urban population. Brazil and Peru have been in the forefront of such opening and acceptance of Japanese and Chinese citizens to the point that during the second war, Brazil became the target of investigations and surveillance of the Japanese community living mainly in the Sao Paulo State.

In fact, Brazil has been and still is the country who has the largest Japanese community living outside of Japan while Peru had a President of Japanese descent.

Within such historical and cultural ties of Latin America, China actually is renewing and renovating the inheritance of shared common memories that were built by previous generations.

You’re right. Eventually or hopefully it will trickle down to Central America which has way more water resources, including Nicaragua’s giant lake and the aquifers of the volcanic areas of Central America. Not to mention the easy access to the Caribbean and Pacific Oceans. Panama now rivals Chile as the most prosperous country in LATAM. The resources is one of the reasons Central America has been so unstable throughout its history. Central America also has been more friendly to the US with no territorial disputes. Central America can also individually address their corruption issues and Costa Rica and Panama are already less corrupt overall than Mexico.

China and Costa Rica

Said El Mansour Cherkaoui 

The Presence of China and Diplomatic Works in the Americas Preferential Trade Agreement Costa Rica is China ‘s second largest trading partner in Central America while China is the second largest trading partner of Costa Rica . In recent years, bilateral trade between the two countries has grown rapidly. In June 2007, China and Costa…Read More

Free Trade and Globalization

Said El Mansour Cherkaoui 

What is a trade agreement, anyway? Trade tensions between the United States and the European Union are not dissipating. The most recent spat is publicly unfolding over President Biden’s signature climate legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Nowhere was the lack of rapprochement clearer than during French President Emmanuel Macron’s state visit to Washington last November, where he was reported to…Read More


Mexico became the United States’ top trading partner this year, as our relationship with China worsened. The milestone reflects a real shift in the dynamics of the global economy. Where once low prices were the priority … now there are more concerns at the table, including resilient supply chains and national security. Read the story @Axios

The U.S. and Mexico are more than neighbors

www.axios.com •

This international trade version of a schoolyard shuffle is amusing. It’s like watching two bullies squaring off, with each one threatening to land a punch, but both too afraid of the potential black eye.

Then suddenly, Mexico appears, quite like the quiet kid who brings candy to the playground, saying, “Hey, how about we be friends instead? It’s a win-win.”

The U.S. takes a moment, looks south, and goes, “Ooooooooooh yeah, I forgot about you” – followed by a forehead slap so loud, it could be heard across the border.

But this doesn’t mean we can put China on ‘read’ and ghost them completely. The dance of diplomacy must go on.

Trade dynamics are ever-shifting. The transition from a China-centric to a more Mexico-inclusive trading scenario is as inevitable as the return of the mullet haircut (please, no).

Like any narrative, there’s a history of love and hate, tariffs and trade-offs, manufacturers and, well, more tariffs. It’s reminiscent of a complicated love triangle on a reality TV show, but with the added thrill of economic consequences and political maneuvers.

Still, as we see Mexico rising like a Phoenix, let’s not forget our old pals. After all, the global economy isn’t a monogamous relationship. …

China’s downward slide has begun. COVID kicked it off. The reduction in global trade was the start, then came their insane “zero-COVID” clownery, then the inevitable fallout when they repealed it. Get ready to read more about “tofu dregs” buildings falling down, the real estate crisis already in progress, the collapse of “Belt-and-Road”, and the reallocation of manufacturing to places like Mexico, India, Vietnam, and even America as automation renders labor prices irrelevant.

On top of all of that, China is going to undergo serious brain-drain in the next decade. Smart people do not want to live under a “social credit” system, nor do they want to live in fear of a draft that would absolutely be needed as an attempted Taiwan invasion gets even more quagmired than Russia in Ukraine and PLA grunts croak by the millions.

The real question is, what will happen to the world economy when China fails. It could be the economic equivalent of Russia failing and a bunch of squabbling nuclear breakaway states appear. Both things need to happen, but it must be managed well. Of course, we don’t have any good managers around.…see more

Declining trade with China means rising costs for US consumers and companies, which could result in stubborn inflation. This can’t be effectively addressed by continuously hiking interest rates for the apparent reason: The Fed can’t fix the worsening diplomatic relations between the US and China.

The key takeaway message from your article then is that prioritizing resilience in supply chains and national security over low prices comes at a high cost—that is, high consumer prices. This can’t be fixed by rising interest rates since interest rates can only solve inflation when the cause is excess demand.…

How is it that cartels are so large, but not affecting trade?

The drug cartels focus mostly on one industry but have been expanding their reach into markets like avocados lately. I don’t see them making inroads into consumer goods. o will reduce its dependence on China so we can reduce dependence by proxy.…see more

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

Mexico seeks to solidify rank as top U.S. trade partner, push further past China

#Mexico became the top U.S. trading partner at the beginning of 2023, with total bilateral trade between the two countries totaling $263 billion during the first four months of this year. Luis Bernardo Torres Ruiz explores this trade relationship in the latest on Dallas Fed Economics: https://lnkd.in/gMFzpV6p

As far as prices go, it’s not that much more than China when you factor in shipping cost from overseas and tariffs. Trade with Mexico isn’t the reason for high inflation, it’s because the Fed printed 6 trillion dollars during the pandemic.



“If you have an opportunity to live somewhere, why shouldn’t you be able to?” …

It may not actually be a bad thing. Whether people like it or not, the U.S. and Mexico are neighbors and necessary economic partners. When you look at all of the friction points between the U.S. and Mexico, they can all be traced back to economic under-development below the border. This results in crime, drugs, and illegal immigration. The increase in legal trade with Mexico brings more prosperity to them and provides the lower-priced imports that we have long depended on China for. This increases exchange and business cooperation between the two countries, which leads to more reciprocal economic development. This not only means Americans settling in Mexico, but also Mexicans opening businesses and buying real estate in America.

Congratulations Mexico! Well done. China continues to threaten the world and you stepped up.

This has the added benefit of the neighbor to the south having additional buying power and creating jobs in Mexico. Products might cost a bit more, but more money stays regionally and hopefully helps stem the flow of those needing to leave their countries looking for work.…

So, explain the immigration issue if Mexico is so prosperous.

Nice parts of any Mexican city are already getting pricey, unless you are actually making a full time tech salary. Look to Honduras, Guatemala and Panama

If the United States is unable to address the affordable housing crisis, it is possible that this could lead some skilled workers to seek opportunities elsewhere, including places such as Mexico City. This could trigger a number of changes, including certain cities becoming new technology centers.

Becoming the next Silicon Valley and attracting young American tech workers won’t happen just by solving the affordable housing problem. Other factors, such as regulatory and policy environments, infrastructure investments, and talent development, all influence whether a region can become a hotspot for technological innovation. And what makes Silicon Valley a global technology center is the accumulation and development over the years, in addition to economic factors.

It is indeed necessary to take into account various factors to attract and retain young skilled workers. The Government, enterprises and all sectors of society should work together to provide young people with development opportunities, create a good living environment and promote sustainable economic growth and social development.…

I agree the article and your comment are separate topics. After reading thru everyone’s comments, I find it interesting that no one has stopped to see how Americans moving to Mexico is affecting the people of Mexico negatively. The word gentrification comes to my mind. American companies already have manufacturing plants in Mexico, and pay Mexican Citizens very little to work there. Now Americans are starting to move to Mexico while getting paid salaries that many Mexicans can only dream of. Here is an article on this problem:
https://ascjcapstone.com/terms/spring-2023/cabelloc/

The out-of-control housing prices in America are primarily due to the impact of our own consumers and geographical preferences. When skilled workers flock to DC, Austin, Portland, Seattle, or San Francisco to get higher-paying jobs, inflation is the predictable result. Creating artificial price controls is not a sustainable strategy. But, dispersing industry beyond these metropolises creates competition between regions and this benefits consumers.…

Mexico is already the #1 place for expats to live and work remotely. And with the proximity to the US it makes it easy for people to travel back to the States to see family and friends.

There is an article in the LA Times about a bunch of remote American workers moving to Mexico City and pushing rent prices through the roof for the locals. Now they want the Americans out. Guadalajara is already doing that within MX. And it has a ton of expats.

Said El Mansour Cherkaoui Research – Publication: From NAFTA to CUSMA

Said El Mansour Cherkaoui From NAFTA to CUSMA

December 8, 1987 – December 8, 2021:
From #NAFTA to #CUSMA

Lic Cuautémoc Cárdenas – Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas Solórzano

  • Publications of Said El Mansour Cherkaoui on Mexico and the Integration of North American Market
  • The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was signed into law by the U.S. President Bill Clinton, reducing barriers to trade and investment between the United States, Mexico, and Canada.

Recent publications of Said El Mansour Cherkaoui, Ph.D. on Mexico and the Integration of North American Market

A Story that started in 1982 at the Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Institut des Hautes sur l’Amérique Latine in Paris, continued at the University of California, Berkeley and Golden Gate University [David Fike], #sanfranciscobay with field research in #mexicocity in 1992 following an invitation from Lic Cuautémoc Cárdenas, the CERDI (Center for Study and Research on the Integrated Development) and the Association of the Doctorands Mexicans who have studied in #parisfrance.

Said El Mansour Cherkaoui publications on the North American Market.

L’Accord de libre-échange nord-américain (ALÉNA) – Rencontre avec Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas

L’Accord de libre-échange nord-américain (ALÉNA) -Célébration de 30 ans de Considération pour le Mexique – Rencontre avec Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas a Berkeley en Californie, a Paris en France et a Mexico City au Mexique.

Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas Solórzano –  Said El Mansour Cherkaoui​ Celebración de 30 años de interés en México, En la víspera de la firma del Tratado de Libre Comercio entre Estados Unidos, Canadá y México. Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) – Celebrando 30 Años de Consideración por México – Reunión con Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas en Berkeley, California, París, Francia y Ciudad de México, México.

North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) – Celebrating 30 Years of Consideration for Mexico – Meeting with Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas in Berkeley, California, Paris, France and Mexico City, Mexico.… Continue reading

Research on NAFTA conducted in Mexico and Published by Golden Gate University, San Francisco, California where Dr. Cherkaoui was Adjunct Associate Professor from 1987 to 2001


★ Canada ★ United States ★ Mexico ★ Agreement


Trump signs USMCA, ‘ending the NAFTA nightmare’


A new Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement

Canada, the United States and Mexico signed a new North American trade agreement to replace NAFTA on November 30, 2018. The CUSMA (or USMCA in the U.S.) came into force in Canada in July 2020. This new agreement goes by a different name in each of the three countries that signed it. While known as CUSMA in Canada, it is called the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, south of the border. In Mexico, people call it T-MEC, reflecting the Spanish name of the treaty.

Many think of CUSMA as NAFTA 2.0—and with good reason. CUSMA and NAFTA are very similar agreements in terms of general concepts. CUSMA continues the work of NAFTA and was negotiated using NAFTA as a baseline. That said, the two agreements do differ in significant ways. It is not for nothing that CUSMA runs to 1500 pages—more than double NAFTA’s page count of 741.

Since July 1, 2020, NAFTA has been replaced by a new free trade agreement CUSMA. As an importer, exporter and manufacturer, for your shipments which will be customs cleared on or after July 1, 2020, you are no longer be able to claim the NAFTA preferential treatment in Canada, the United States or Mexico. From this date on, for products “originating” in North America, you will have to claim a preferential treatment under the new CUSMA treaty.

AS OF JULY 1, customs authorities (e.g. CBSA and U.S. CBP) will not accept a NAFTA Certificate of Origin to claim the CUSMA “duty-free” treatment. For your 2020 blanket certificates of origin, prepared according to NAFTA, these will apply up to June 30, 2020, only. Effective July 1, the product must be certified as an “originating” good per a CUSMA Certification of Origin.

Unlike NAFTA, the new agreement does not call for a prescribed form. Instead, CUSMA requires a Certification of Origin, which can be included on a commercial invoice or a separate document, insofar as this new Certification contains all the mandatory minimum data elements set out in Chapter 5 / Annex 5-A of CUSMA.

CUSMA Certificate of Origin - English

Previous sample of the trilaterally agreed upon form used by Canada, Mexico, and the United States to certify that goods qualify for the preferential tariff treatment accorded by CUSMA. The Certificate of Origin must be completed by the exporter.

To allow W2C to apply the “duty-free” treatment under CUSMA to your products that will be customs cleared on or after July 1, W2C must be in possession of a valid CUSMA Certification of Origin, included either on the commercial invoice, Canada Customs Invoice or Proforma Invoice; or included on a CUSMA Certificate of Origin template of any format that contains all of the prescribed minimum data elements.

See also additional information on the CUSMA Certification of Origin, as published by the CBSA.

W2C has developed a CUSMA Certification of Origin template which you can access via the “Resources” tab available on our website: https://w2c.ca/en/resources/.

Also be advised that the “Rules of Origin” (NAFTA vs. CUSMA) for several products (HS Codes), have changed. Before goods produced in Canada, the United States or Mexico can be certified on a Certification of Origin, they must qualify as an “originating” product under the “Rules of Origin” of the new CUSMA agreement. A product previously certified under NAFTA is not valid if imported/exported on or after July 1. Such a product must be re-qualified and re-certified under the new CUSMA rules.


Donald J. Trump‏ Verified account@realDonaldTrump  4:04 PM · Jun 9, 2018·

PM Justin Trudeau of Canada acted so meek and mild during our @G7 meetings only to give a news conference after I left saying that, “US Tariffs were kind of insulting” and he “will not be pushed around.” Very dishonest & weak. Our Tariffs are in response to his of 270% on dairy! – 

NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT


Click here to return to NAFTA Index page

NAFTA – Chapter One: Objectives PART ONE: GENERAL PART

Article 101 : Establishment of the Free Trade Area
Article 102 : Objectives
Article 103 : Relation to Other Agreements
Article 104 : Relation to Environmental and Conservation Agreements
Article 105 : Extent of Obligations
Annex 104.1 : Bilateral and Other Environmental and Conservation Agreements

Article 101: Establishment of the Free Trade Area

The Parties to this Agreement, consistent with Article XXIV of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade , hereby establish a free trade area.

Article 102: Objectives

1. The objectives of this Agreement, as elaborated more specifically through its principles and rules, including national treatment, most-favored-nation treatment and transparency, are to:

  • a) eliminate barriers to trade in, and facilitate the cross-border movement of, goods and services between the territories of the Parties;
  • b) promote conditions of fair competition in the free trade area;
  • c) increase substantially investment opportunities in the territories of the Parties;
  • d) provide adequate and effective protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights in each Party’s territory;
  • e) create effective procedures for the implementation and application of this Agreement, for its joint administration and for the resolution of disputes; and
  • f) establish a framework for further trilateral, regional and multilateral cooperation to expand and enhance the benefits of this Agreement.

2. The Parties shall interpret and apply the provisions of this Agreement in the light of its objectives set out in paragraph 1 and in accordance with applicable rules of international law.

Article 103: Relation to Other Agreements

  • 1. The Parties affirm their existing rights and obligations with respect to each other under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and other agreements to which such Parties are party.
  • 2. In the event of any inconsistency between this Agreement and such other agreements, this Agreement shall prevail to the extent of the inconsistency, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement.

Article 104: Relation to Environmental and Conservation Agreements

1. In the event of any inconsistency between this Agreement and the specific trade obligations set out in:

  • a) the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora , done at Washington, March 3, 1973, as amended June 22, 1979,
  • b) the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer , done at Montreal, September 16, 1987, as amended June 29, 1990,
  • c) the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal , done at Basel, March 22, 1989, on its entry into force for Canada, Mexico and the United States, or
  • d) the agreements set out in Annex 104.
  • 1, such obligations shall prevail to the extent of the inconsistency, provided that where a Party has a choice among equally effective and reasonably available means of complying with such obligations, the Party chooses the alternative that is the least inconsistent with the other provisions of this Agreement.
  • 2. The Parties may agree in writing to modify Annex 104.1 to include any amendment to an agreement referred to in paragraph 1, and any other environmental or conservation agreement.

Article 105: Extent of Obligations

The Parties shall ensure that all necessary measures are taken in order to give effect to the provisions of this Agreement, including their observance, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, by state and provincial governments.

Annex 104.

1 Bilateral and Other Environmental and Conservation Agreements

  • 1. The Agreement Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America Concerning the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste , signed at Ottawa, October 28, 1986.
  • 2. The Agreement Between the United States of America and the United Mexican States on Cooperation for the Protection and Improvement of the Environment in the Border Area ,

signed at La Paz, Baja California Sur, August 14, 1983.

These agreements electronically are a public service for general reference. Every effort has been made to ensure that the text presented is complete and accurate. However, copies needed for legal purposes should be obtained from official archives maintained by the appropriate agency.

US Trade Moving Mexico in Front of China for the New Re-Globalization

 Said El Mansour Cherkaoui  July 13, 2023 – Said El Mansour Cherkaoui Dr. Said El Mansour Cherkaoui has conducted research on Brazil, Mexico,… Read More

Said El Mansour Cherkaoui Research – Publication: From NAFTA to CUSMA

 Said El Mansour Cherkaoui  February 16, 2023 – Said El Mansour Cherkaoui From NAFTA to CUSMA December 8, 1987 – December 8, 2021: From #NAFTA to #CUSMA Lic… Read More

Brazil – Africa and Lula

 Said El Mansour Cherkaoui  February 15, 2024 – Publications and Research on Brazil by Dr. Said El Mansour Cherkaoui Originally published October 31,… Read More

Views and Reviews on Latin America

 Said El Mansour Cherkaoui  September 3, 2023 – We offer and provide you with News, Analysis, Reports, Research, and Articles based on more… Read More

Said El Mansour Cherkaoui on Latin America

 Said El Mansour Cherkaoui  November 22, 2022 – Sudamerica América do Sul South America Amérique du Sud Said El Mansour Cherkaoui … Read More

NAFTA and Labor

NAFTA Overview and Its Effect on Undocumented Immigration NAFTA stands for the North American Free Trade Agreement and it is a Preferential Trade Agreement (PTA) between the United States, Mexico, and Canada.  A PTA is an agreement between a group of countries to levy low or zero tariffs against imports from members.  NAFTA took effect in January of 1994, and at the time, it was  “NAFTA and Labor” Posted April 23, 2020… Continue reading

NAFTA Twenty Years After

NAFTA at 20: One Million U.S. Jobs Lost, Higher Income Inequality By Lori Wallach My New Year’s celebrations this year were haunted by memories of January 1, 1994 — the day that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) went into effect. I remember crying that day, thinking about the proud men and women in union halls across America, the Mexican campesinos and the inspiring Canadian activists ★ “NAFTA Twenty Years Later” Posted by I … Continue reading


Trump and NAFTA: Path of Negotiation and Reinvention

Read more: Trump Sours Flagging NAFTA Talks With Steel Trade War Threats | Newsmax.com POLITICAL WILL Officials say a handful of less contentious NAFTA chapters could still be concluded during the latest round of talks, and three people at the talks said the technical teams remained focused on their tasks, despite the uncertainty the steel tariff ★ Posted April 23, 2020 ★ Continue reading “Trump and NAFTA: Path of Negotiation and Reinvention”

NAFTA: U.S. and Mexico Preliminary Deal

President Trump said the United States and Mexico would be entering into a new trade deal called the United States-Mexico trade agreement, and that he wanted to get rid of the name of the 24-year-old North American Free Trade Agreement, a crucial step toward revamping a trade pact that has appeared on the brink of ★ Posted April 23, 2020 ★ Continue reading “NAFTA: U.S. and Mexico Preliminary Deal”


Immigration and North American Market

CROSS THE BORDER WITH TACO BELL NO CROSSING THE WALL WITH SMART DETECTORS Climbing the Wall and the Van of the Migra: Border US-Mexico The issue of immigration was not tackled, reduced or resolved neither with the Bracero Program, the Maquiladoras, the opening of the Mexican Economy and its complete liberalization and privatization, and the ★ Continue reading “Immigration and North American Market” ★ Posted July 14, 2020

Migration and Trade in North America: Trump Vision

Collision of Immigration and Trade: North America Versus Central America Trump putting 5% tariff on Mexican imports By The Associated Press | Posted: Thu 7:53 PM, May 30, 2019  | Updated: Thu 8:08 PM, May 30, 2019 WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says he is slapping a 5% tariff on all Mexican imports to pressure the country to do more to ★ Posted April 23, 2020 ★ Continue reading “Migration and Trade in North America: Trump Vision”


North American Free Trade Agreement

The North American Free Trade Agreement created a preferential tariff area among the United States, Canada, and Mexico beginning on January 1, 1994. However, the drive for regional economic cooperation had begun as early as 1851 with bilateral free trade negotiations between the United States and Canada. A free trade area involving the United States and all of Latin America was advocated by U.S. secretary ★ “North American Free Trade Agreement” ★ Posted April 23, 2020… Continue reading

Mexico – City 1990 ★ Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas and Said El Mansour Cherkaoui

Cuauhtémoc Cardenas el hombre que institucionalizó a la izquierda About the Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas Solórzano Hijo de Lázaro Cárdenas del Río, nació en 1934, en la Ciudad de México. Es ingeniero civil por la UNAM con estudios en Francia, Alemania e Italia. Entre 1961 y 1964 dirigió el Movimiento de Liberación Nacional. Fue miembro del PRI Continue reading “Mexico – City 1990 ★ Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas and Said El Mansour Cherkaoui​” ★ Posted


US-Mexico-Canada Agreement

Why the big push for NAFTA if the promised gains were so modest and uncertain? Some of the explanation centers on the indirect benefits the United States could expect to derive from the Mexican prosperity predicted to result from its recent liberalization–if NAFTA could make it permanent. Even if NAFTA created no net trade increases ★ “US-Mexico-Canada Agreement” ★Posted July 2, 2019… Continue reading

North American Free Trade Agreement

The North American Free Trade Agreement created a preferential tariff area among the United States, Canada, and Mexico beginning on January 1, 1994. However, the drive for regional economic cooperation had begun as early as 1851 with bilateral free trade negotiations between the United States and Canada. A free trade area involving the United States…Lire la Suite →

Mexico – US – Canada: NAFTA to CUSMA with Said El Mansour Cherkaoui

L’Accord de libre-échange nord-américain (ALÉNA) -Rencontre avec Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas 8/29/2015 – to this date of 5/8/2022 Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas Solórzano –  Said El Mansour Cherkaoui​ [Spanish – English – French] Celebración de 32 años de Said El Mansour Cherkaoui interés en México En la víspera de la firma del Tratado de Libre Comercio entre Estados Unidos, Canadá y México, fui a México, donde continué mi conversación … Continue reading

Said El Mansour Cherkaoui: NAFTA and CUSMA

Mexico City: August 1990 – Oakland – June 1992 – Paris, France – California: 8/29/2015 – to this date of 5/8/2022 Initial Research and Publication on Regional Market Integration Case – Studies of the European Economic Community and the North American Free Trade Agreement Mexico – US – Canada L’Accord de libre-échange nord-américain (ALÉNA) -Rencontre…Continue Reading →

From NAFTA to CUSMA

★ Canada ★ United States ★ Mexico ★ Agreement Trump signs USMCA, ‘ending the NAFTA nightmare’ Since July 1, 2020, NAFTA has been replaced by a new free trade agreement CUSMA. As an importer, exporter and manufacturer, for your shipments which will be customs cleared on or after July 1, 2020, you are no longer…Continue Reading →


Disclaimer:

Please note that all information on this Website is subject to change. All articles are for information purposes only.

We are always available to answer in detail any questions our clients may have regarding the aforementioned information . Contact us at: support@triconsultingkyoto.com

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started